Gp. Cheplick et Cm. Gutierrez, Clonal growth and storage in relation to competition in genets of the rhizomatous perennial Amphibromus scabrivalvis, CAN J BOTAN, 78(4), 2000, pp. 537-546
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE
The grass Amphibromus scabrivalvis Trin. Swallen produces new ramets from t
he base of established ramets (to produce a phalanx growth form) and along
rhizomes (to produce a guerrilla growth form). It stores resources in stem
bases. This research examined genotypic variation in clonal growth and stor
age and its relation to the performance of replicated genets under competit
ion. It was hypothesized that (i) genets would vary significantly in traits
important to clonal growth and storage during competition, (ii) competitio
n would reduce clonal growth capability, (iii) guerrilla-like spacing would
enhance clonal growth under competition at low competitor density, and (iv
) allocation to storage organs would increase under competition. Fourteen g
enets of A. scabrivalvis were divided into ramets and planted into pots in
the glasshouse alone or in competition with four equally distributed seedli
ngs of Lolium perenne L., a phalanx competitor. Leaf area and mass, as well
as the distance of new ramets from the parental ramet, were measured at 9
and 18 weeks. Dry mass of leaves, stem bases, rhizomes, and roots was deter
mined at 18 weeks. Relative competition intensity, based on the difference
in total mass per genet between control and competition treatments relative
to the control, varied between 0.69 and 0.83. Ramet production, the propor
tion of the total leaf area in new ramets, and ramet distances varied signi
ficantly among genets and were reduced by competition. Mean ramet distance
was positively correlated with total mass. Allocation of dry mass to storag
e organs was significantly increased under competition and may allow genet
persistence within an occupied area. The relative ranking of genets in the
control and competition treatment was not different, and there were no diff
erences in the relative degree to which the total mass of genets was reduce
d by competition, despite significant variation in total mass accumulated i
n the absence of competition.