This study compares the effectiveness of several chemical evaluation proced
ures to predict Cu, and Zn concentrations in lettuce (Lactuca sativa 'Butte
rcrunch') grown on contaminated soils from the Montreal urban area. The pla
nt growth assays were performed in the greenhouse using field-collected non
-spiked soils. The soils were characterized using several chemical extracti
on reagents, as well as electrochemical speciation of the soil solution fre
e metal species. The chemical characterization was supplemented with labile
metal pool determinations using anion exchange membranes treated with DTPA
or EDTA. The results show that the more sophisticated electrochemical spec
iation and exchange resins procedures did not consistently improve predicti
ons of metal uptake. We believe this is due to the minimization of metal so
lubility caused by the circumneutral or alkaline pH values and the relative
homogeneity of the relatively small urban soil sample set that we used. Th
e metal solubility and bioavailability in the soils tested were minimized b
y the particular chemical properties of the soils, obscuring any potential
advantages from more discriminate soil chemical evaluation procedures. Neve
rtheless, the reported regressions (for 10 different methods) are valid est
imates of Cu and Zn phytoavailability in contaminated urban soils.