Currently our intra-oral model uses enamel specimens that have been disinfe
cted by soaking in buffered formalin (pH 6.8). However, because of increasi
ng emphasis on infection control, it is important to identify a way to ster
ilize these specimens. The aim of this study was to determine if autoclaved
, or gas sterilized, lesioned enamel responds to fluoride (F) in the same w
ay alcohol-disinfected enamel lesions do. Seventy-two formalin-disinfected,
human enamel specimens (3 mm) were lesioned in demineralizing solution for
96 h and were then divided into three groups. One group was autoclaved; on
e group was gas sterilized (ethylene oxide), end the remaining 24 specimens
were further disinfected in 70% ethanol for 10 min. Specimens in each grou
p were then treated 4 times/day for 4 weeks with 0, 250 or 1,100 ppm F dent
ifrice slurries in an in vitro cycling, remin/demin model. Following treatm
ent, fluoride up take was analyzed by microdrill biopsy, and lesion depth a
nd mineral content changes (BM) were determined by transverse microradiogra
phy, Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA analysis. In all three groups of s
pecimens there were significant (p<0.05) differences in fluoride uptake in
response to different fluoride treatments. Autoclaved lesions failed to pro
vide dose-response data with regard to changes in lesion mineral content, B
ecause formalin and 70% alcohol are only disinfectants, and autoclaving alt
ered the responsiveness of enamel lesions, results from this study suggest
that, of the methods tested, gas sterilization is the preferred method for
sterilizing enamel specimens that will be used in intra-oral studies. Copyr
ight (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.