Study objectives: To determine the recording capabilities of the POLY-MESAM
(PM) unit (MAP; Martinsried, Germany), an American Sleep Disorders Associa
tion level III system, and to compare it with simultaneous 12-channel polys
omnography in the sleep laboratory.
Measurements and results: Fifty-three patients (49 men and 4 women) with ob
structive sleep-related breathing disorders of varying severity were includ
ed. The apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHIs) obtained using the two, methods diffe
red significantly from each other, although the correlation was close. The
PM unit produced false-negative results in patients with mild to moderate o
bstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The sensitivity of the PM unit in detecting p
atients with an AHI > 10 was 92%, while the specificity was 96.3%.
Conclusions: The correlation elf AHIs obtained with polysomnography and wit
h the PM unit is close. However, in some cases, the PM may underestimate OS
A parameters. The PM unit produces false-negative results in patients with
mild to moderate OSA. While inpatient polysomnography remains the "gold sta
ndard," the PM unit may provide an inexpensive alternative in some special
cases.