Cl. Grote et al., Responses to perceived unethical practices in clinical neuropsychology: Ethical and legal considerations, CLIN NEURPS, 14(1), 2000, pp. 119-134
Neuropsychologists often review the work of colleagues who have performed a
neuropsychological evaluation. At times, these reviews may cause one to be
lieve that a colleague acted in an unethical manner. However, it is often u
nclear whether the situation warrants contacting the colleague or filing a
complaint. This article provides examples of potential unethical practices
in neuropsychology, and then reviews the relevant ethical principles and le
gal precedents concerning the obligations and possible risks of reporting p
erceived unethical practices of a colleague. The paper concludes with a ser
ies of recommendations and options as to when and how one should proceed in
such situations.