The efficacy of Le Bon Depart and Sensory Integration treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized study with six single cases
C. Leemrijse et al., The efficacy of Le Bon Depart and Sensory Integration treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized study with six single cases, CLIN REHAB, 14(3), 2000, pp. 247-259
Objective: Evaluation of the efficacy of Le Bon Depart (LBD) treatment and
Sensory integration (SI) treatment on motor performance of children with de
velopmental coordination disorder.
Design: A single subject design with multiple baseline and alternating trea
tments. Order of treatment and length of phase were randomized. Measurement
s were blinded.
Setting: Department of Occupational Therapy at the Academic Hospital Vrije
Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Subjects: Five boys and one girl with developmental coordination disorder (
age: 6.0-8.1 years).
Interventions: Baseline condition, Le Bon Depart treatment and Sensory inte
gration treatment.
Main outcome measures: The Movement ABC, Praxis Tests, a rhythm test and vi
sual analogue scales. With the exception of the Praxis Tests, lower scores
indicate better performance.
Results: During both treatments, the performance on the Movement ABC ((x) o
ver bar = 7.21) and the scores on the visual analogue scales ((x) over bar
= 46.64) were significantly better than in the baseline (Movement ABC(basel
ine): (x) over bar = 17.38; visual analogue scales(baseline): (x) over bar
= 68.18). After treatment 2, performance on the Praxis Tests and scores on
the visual analogue scales were significantly better than after treatment 1
(Praxis Tests: 113.54 versus 104.68; visual analogue scales: 34.74 versus
58.54). All six children performed better on the Movement ABC during treatm
ent as compared to the baseline. Le Bon Depart led to significant improveme
nt on all dependent variables, Sensory Integration on the visual analogue s
cales only. The improvements after Le Bon Depart were larger than the impro
vements after Sensory Integration treatment. On the rhythm test this differ
ence was significant: LED led to an improvement of 43.01 points, while the
improvement after SI was 17.59 points (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Motor performance of children with developmental coordination d
isorder improved significantly on all dependent variables after the combina
tion of treatments. Le Bon Depart led to more improvement than Sensory Inte
gration. LED appears to be a valuable treatment method for children with de
velopmental coordination disorder.