Physiologic evaluation of noninvasive mechanical ventilation delivered with three types of masks in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure

Citation
P. Navalesi et al., Physiologic evaluation of noninvasive mechanical ventilation delivered with three types of masks in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, CRIT CARE M, 28(6), 2000, pp. 1785-1790
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1785 - 1790
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200006)28:6<1785:PEONMV>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objective: The efficacy of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in imp roving breathing pattern and arterial blood gases (ABG) in hypercapnic pati ents has been well documented; however, little attention has been given to the choice of the interface and the ventilatory mode. We evaluated the effe cts of three types of masks and two modes of ventilation on patients' ABG, breathing pattern, and tolerance to ventilation. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Two respiratory weaning centers. Patients: A total of 26 stable hypercapnic patients (pH, 7.38 +/- 0.04; Pac o(2), 59.2. +/- 10.9 torr) had not received NIMV and were affected by restr ictive thoracic disease or obstructive pulmonary disease. Interventions Three 30-min runs of NIMV, delivered using volume-assisted (n = 13) or pressure-assisted modes of partial mechanical support (0 = 13), w ere performed in random order with a full-face mask, a nasal mask, and nasa l plugs. Measurements: ABG, breathing pattern, and patients' tolerance to ventilatio n. Main Results:Compared with spontaneous breathing, the application of NIMV s ignificantly improved ABG and minute ventilation, irrespective of the venti latory mode, the underlying pathology or the type of mask. Overall, a nasal mask was better tolerated than the other two interfaces (p < .005 vs, nasa l plugs and full-face mask). Pace, was significantly lower (p < .01) with a full-face mask or nasal plugs than with a nasal mask (49.5 +/- 9.4 torr, 4 9.7 +/- 8 torr, and 52.4 +/- 11 torr, respectively). Minute Ventilation was significantly higher with a full-face mask than with a nasal mask because of an increase in tidal volume. No differences were observed in tolerance t o ventilation, ABG, or breathing pattern, using assist control or pressure- assisted modes. Conclusions: In this physiologic study, we have shown that in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure, irrespective of the underlying pathology, the type of interface affects the NIMV outcome more than the ventilatory m ode.