J. Adams et al., Workshop to identify critical windows of exposure for children's health: Neurobehavioral work group summary, ENVIR H PER, 108, 2000, pp. 535-544
This paper summarizes the deliberations of a work group charged with addres
sing specific questions relevant to risk estimation in developmental neurot
oxicology. We focused on eight questions. a) Does it make sense to think ab
out discrete windows of vulnerability in the development of the nervous sys
tem? If it does, which time periods are of greatest importance? b) Are ther
e cascades of developmental disorders in the nervous system? For example, a
re there critical points that determine the course of development that can
lead to differences in vulnerabilities at later times! c) Can information o
n critical windows suggest the most susceptible subgroups of children (i.e.
, age groups, socioeconomic status, geographic areas, race, etc.)! di What
are the gaps in existing data for the nervous system or end points of expos
ure to it! e) What are the best ways to examine exposure-response relations
hips and estimate exposures in vulnerable life stages! f) What other exposu
res that affect development at certain ages may interact with exposures of
concern! g) How well do laboratory animal data predict human response! h) H
ow can all of this information be used to improve risk assessment and publi
c health (risk management)? In addressing these questions, we provide a bri
ef overview of brain development from conception through adolescence and em
phasize vulnerability to toxic insult throughout this period. Methodologica
l issues focus on major Variables that influence exposure or its detection
through disruptions of behavior, neuroanatomy, or neurochemical end points.
Supportive evidence from studies of major neurotoxicants is provided.