One of the most troublesome problems fur fisheries acoustic surveys is the
acquisition of ground truth data. A major incentive fur the use of acoustic
s is the deficiencies of the same alternate techniques that must be used to
collect ground truth data. However, such data are often required for biolo
gical information such as species composition, body size and spawning condi
tion. In addition, since acoustic techniques are not universally accepted,
ground truth information was sometimes needed to establish confidence in th
e results. Many different approaches are used to obtain ground truth data.
Examination of these results provides some interesting insights into the ch
aracteristics of both the acoustic and the ground truth techniques and sugg
ests some principles fur ground truth efforts used in conjunction with acou
stics surveys. The appropriate role of ground truth efforts is not only ver
ification, but also to aid interpretation of the acoustic data. We conclude
that the use of a single method to obtain ground truth data is generally l
ikely to be inadequate. We recommend multiple methods for ground truth, so
that inadequacy of individual techniques is to some extent compensated by s
upplementary methods. This requires a reorientation of planning for most fi
sheries acoustic surveys. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserve
d.