A field trial was installed to compare the in-ground performance of three r
etentions of each of two oilborne preservative formulations: 1) conventiona
l high-temperature creosote (HTC); and 2) a modified creosote formulation,
pigment-emulsified creosote (PEC). Nominal retentions targeted for each for
mulation were 50, 100, and 200 kg/m(3) (3.1, 6.3, and 12.6 pcf). Also inclu
ded in the field trial were specimens treated to 308 kg/m(3) of PEC emulsio
n to yield an equivalent retention of 200 kg/m3 HTC. Treated and untreated
Eucalyptus regnans sapwood specimens were exposed horizontally belowground
to a range of economically important species of subterranean termites and w
ood-rotting fungi at three test sites in Australia. After 1 1 years of expo
sure, E. regnans specimens treated with 200 kg/m(3) of HTC and specimens tr
eated with PEC containing 200 kg/m3 of creosote continue to perform well. R
esults obtained from the field trial indicate that PEC will perform as well
as HTC on an equivalent creosote retention basis. Test specimens were freq
uently encountered by the target species of termites (Mastotermes darwinien
sis and Coptotermes acinaciformis). In addition, other termite species of l
esser economic importance were often observed attacking the softened, funga
l-infected surfaces of some of the treated test specimens. Soft rot was the
dominant rot type present on treated specimens recorded with fungal degrad
e.