This paper deals with the creation, growth and current decline of the Sudan
ese capital, Khartoum, since the early nineteenth century. It describes the
distinct ways in which the two main settlements in the conurbation - Umm-D
urman and Khartoum - have been planned, the former along Arab-Islamic lines
and the latter as a British Colonial town. After independence in 1956, the
capital enjoyed a prominent, if brief, period of flourish in most aspects
of life. In the mid-1970s chaos set in. The 'deplanning' process was initia
lly prompted by various motives and, since the early 1980s, has gradually b
een institutionalised. The positive planning features were obliterated afte
r the town planning machinery was marginalised and almost dismantled. The o
nce-beautiful town was vulgarised, vandalised, ruralised and 'censored' by
the state under various labels and excuses. But towns, we know, have their
own ways of saying things and it is all the more interesting when what the
town says is in direct opposition to what the state officially declares. Th
is paper tries to document the 'deplanning' of Khartoum by interpreting the
messages the town sends, tracing the symptoms of this process and suggesti
ng remedies for what has not been irretrievably lost. (C) 2000 Elsevier Sci
ence Ltd. All rights reserved.