Many surveillance methods for nosocomial infections (NIs) have been put for
ward in the literature, and all have their advantages and disadvantages. Di
fferent surveillance methods are useful, depending on whether the objective
of surveillance is only to increase sensitivity to infection control probl
ems and to identify areas with possible infection control problems; to conf
irm a possible infection control problem through comparison with other unit
s or departments; or to use surveillance data for identifying the sources o
f infections. Furthermore, time effectiveness is a major point in selecting
the most appropriate method, particularly the method for case identificati
on. In units or departments with a high level of NI, even highly time-consu
ming surveillance methods may be ultimately time-effective; in units or dep
artments with a lower level of NI, the time-effectiveness depends on the ti
me necessary for case identification. Close liaison with staff in the units
is a sine qua non for the success of all surveillance activities (Infect C
ontrol Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:366-370).