Increasingly, archaeologists are recognizing cultural anthropological work
in New Guinea as an important source of ethnographic analogy for understand
ing the initial stages of cultural evolution. This article critically revie
ws the literature on leadership in contact-era New Guinea. It is intended a
s an introduction both to different theoretical interpretations of leadersh
ip, as these have developed from Marshal Sahlins's Big-man archetype to the
present, and to the primary literature on the topic. It points to several
implications for archaeological theory, identifies a number of problems in
the ethnography and theory of contact-era New Guinea leadership, and conclu
des with a brief guide to deploying the ethnographic and theoretical litera
ture.