Irinotecan as second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: Dilemmas regarding patient selection and toxicity prediction

Citation
Z. Nikolic-tomasevic et al., Irinotecan as second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: Dilemmas regarding patient selection and toxicity prediction, J CHEMOTHER, 12(3), 2000, pp. 244-251
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY
ISSN journal
1120009X → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
244 - 251
Database
ISI
SICI code
1120-009X(200006)12:3<244:IASTIM>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Irinotecan (Campto(R), Rhone-Poulene Rorer) is probably the most studied dr ug used as second-line treatment for colorectal cancer. Its main disadvanta ges are toxicity and cost. Delayed diarrhea and neutropenia are the most co mmon toxic side effects, both of which can usually be predicted, by knowing the criteria for patients who are at increased risk for those side effects . These criteria include poor performance status (>2), bulky disease, previ ous abdominal-pelvic irradiation, hyperleukocytosis and increased bilirubin >1.5 x normal upper range. There are some other less common toxic effects of irinotecan, such as pneumonitis, cardiac arrhythmia, paralytic ileus, li ver dysfunction, tumor lysis syndrome. While these side effects are very ra re, physicians should be able to recognize them, because the number of pati ents being treated with irinotecan is increasing. The authors report four c ases of probable irinotecan-related toxicity with fatal outcome in all 4 pa tients. Two of these 4 patients were not in the known risk categories for i rinotecan toxicity. One patient died with signs of hepato-renal syndrome, t he other with signs of rapid tumor lysis-like syndrome. Two other patients with bulky disease and performance status 2, had increased urea, creatinine and bilirubin serum levels after irinotecan administration, that could not be explained as manifestation of disease progression only. Data on all uncommon irinotecan toxic effects should be gathered and analyz ed so that toxic effects, other than diarrhea and neutropenia, are better d efined and predicted.