Objectives: To obtain an estimate of working times of Class TI copy-milled
ceramic inlays as an indication of their efficiency, and to analyse factors
of influence.
Methods: In a controlled clinical trial, 173 MO/DO or MOD ceramic inlays of
the Celay system were constructed in 101 patients. Treatment was carried o
ut by seven dentists. The inlays were replacements of existing amalgam rest
orations in both molar and premolar teeth. Net-times needed for the treatme
nt and for the laboratory stage were registered. Variables of influence on
the working time were assessed by using In-working times in ANOVA. Differen
ces of working times were expressed as the relative difference between the
upper and lower value of each variable (Delta).
Results: The mean clinical treatment time was 67(+/-22) min. The laboratory
stage required 60(+/-17) min working time. 'Cavity modification technique'
(composite basing/conventional, Delta = 17%), 'clinical operator' (seven d
entists, Delta = 57%), and 'size of the restoration' (large/medium, Delta =
16%) significantly influenced the clinical treatment time (p < 0.001). Alt
hough the dentists were familiar with inlay construction, they showed a 25%
decrease in working time towards the end of the study.
Conclusions: Class II copy-milled ceramic inlays in this time-and-motion st
udy required about 125 min of working time. Working time increased by apply
ing composite basing and making large restorations. The dentist influenced
working times, while efficiency increased over time. Dentists needed more l
aboratory time to produce an inlay than the dental technician. (C) 2000 Els
evier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.