We investigate the portfolio choices of mean-variance-optimizing investors
who use sample evidence to update prior beliefs centered on either risk-bas
ed or characteristic-based pricing models. With dogmatic beliefs in such mo
dels and an unconstrained ratio of position size to capital, optimal portfo
lios can differ across models to economically significant degrees. The diff
erences are substantially reduced by modest uncertainty about the models' p
ricing abilities. When the ratio of position size to capital is subject to
realistic constraints,the differences in portfolios across models become ev
en less important and are nonexistent in some cases. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scie
nce S.A. All rights reserved.