The notion of consent which rose to the forefront in biomedical ethics as a
n attempt to safeguard patients' autonomy, is relatively new. The notion it
self requires qualification, for it precludes neither duress nor ignorance.
More seriously, I argue here that consent is redundant except in situation
s where paternalism prevails. Paradoxically, these are the very situations
where it may be difficult to uphold or to verify voluntary consent. I sugge
st that a request-based relationship has the potential to overcome these di
fficulties. It enhances patients' participation in decision making, require
s that the patients remain in command and avoids their subordination. Reque
st is also more conducive to treatments that are representative of patients
' own values and perceptions. In practice, what one wants and what one agre
es to, often concur. But these are not conceptually identical issues, and t
hey carry important differences of emphasis.