Conservation of substructures in proteins: Interfaces of secondary structural elements in proteasomal subunits

Citation
C. Gille et al., Conservation of substructures in proteins: Interfaces of secondary structural elements in proteasomal subunits, J MOL BIOL, 299(4), 2000, pp. 1147-1154
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00222836 → ACNP
Volume
299
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1147 - 1154
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2836(20000616)299:4<1147:COSIPI>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
It is observed that during divergent evolution of two proteins with a commo n phylogenetic origin, the structural similarity of their backbones is ofte n preserved even when the sequence similarity between them decreases to a v irtually undetectable level. Here we analyzed,whether the conservation of s tructure along evolution involves also the local atomic structures in the i nterfaces between secondary structural elements. We have used as study case one protein family, the proteasomal subunits, for which 17 crystal structu res are known. These include 14 different subunits of Saccharomyces cerevis iae, 2 subunits of Thermoplasma acidophilum and one subunit of Escherichia coli. The structural core of the 17 proteasomal subunits has 23 secondary s tructural elements. Any two adjacent secondary structural elements form a m olecular interface consisting of two molecular patches. We found 61 interfa ces that occurred in all 17 subunits. The 3D shape of equivalent molecular patches from different proteasomal subunits were compared by superposition. Our results demonstrate that pairs of equivalent molecular patches show an RMSD which is lower than that of randomly chosen patches from unrelated pr oteins. This is true even when patch comparisons with identical residues we re excluded from the analysis. Furthermore it is known that the sequential dissimilarity is correlated to the RMSD between the backbones of the member s of protein families. The question arises whether this is also true for lo cal atomic structures. The results show that the correlation of individual patch RMSD values and local sequence dissimilarities is low and has a wide range from 0 to 0.41, however, it is surprising that there is a good correl ation between the average RMSD of all corresponding patches and the global sequence dissimilarity. This average patch RMSD correlates slightly stronge r than the C-alpha-trace RMSD to the global sequence dissimilarity. (C) 200 0 Academic Press.