Jb. Powers et al., EFFECTS OF PHOTOPERIOD DURATION AND MELATONIN SIGNAL CHARACTERISTICS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE-SYSTEM OF MALE SYRIAN-HAMSTERS, Journal of neuroendocrinology, 9(6), 1997, pp. 451-466
Three experiments tested effects of photoperiod and the pineal hormone
melatonin (MEL) on reproductive function among male Syrian hamsters,
In Experiment 1, hamsters were exposed for 32 weeks to 1 of 4 short ph
otoperiods which varied in duration (11.5 L; 10 L; 8 L; 6 L). A fifth
group was shifted from 11.5 L to 6 L after 6 weeks. Shorter photoperio
ds were associated with more rapid regression of the testes, but all g
roups eventually regressed to the same extent, In contrast, the tempor
al profile of testicular recrudescence, expressed as males became phot
orefractory, was not significantly different between groups. A decreas
e in photoperiod from 11.5 L to 6 L after 6 weeks did not delay the on
set of recrudescence, The 11.5 L group was subdivided at week 32 and t
ransferred to either 13 L or 16 L for the next 8 weeks to break photor
efractoriness. Upon subsequent exposure to 8 L, both subgroups regress
ed their testes in similar fashion over weeks 40-52, indicating that t
he two long photoperiods were equally effective in breaking photorefra
ctoriness, Nevertheless, FSH and prolactin were more consistently supp
ressed in the 16 L group following the switch to 8 L. Experiment 2 tes
ted whether differing durations of MEL, administered s.c. each night f
or 9 weeks, elicit graded rates of reproductive regression in pinealec
tomized males. Testicular regression was more rapid in the group recei
ving MEL for 12 h than it was in the group receiving MEL for 8.5 h, th
us supporting the hypothesis that the faster rates of testicular regre
ssion in the shorter photoperiods of Experiment 1 were due to their co
ncomitant longer durations of nightly MEL secretion. Experiment 3 test
ed the hypothesis that rates of testicular regression in males receivi
ng exogenous MEL would be affected by their prior photoperiodic histor
y, Males were exposed to 18 L or 14 L for 7 weeks, then pinealectomize
d and administered 9.5 h MEL infusions s.c. each night for 9 weeks. In
contrast to predictions, photoperiodic history had only transitory ef
fects on MEL-induced testicular regression, Although the differences i
n MEL duration that accompany different short photoperiods have reprod
uctive consequences (Experiment 1), the extent to which MEL duration e
xpands during the transition from stimulatory to inhibitory photoperio
ds appears to be a less significant variable (Experiment 3).