Current approaches to treatment for HIV-1 infection

Authors
Citation
Wg. Powderly, Current approaches to treatment for HIV-1 infection, J NEUROVIRO, 6, 2000, pp. S8-S13
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY
ISSN journal
13550284 → ACNP
Volume
6
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
1
Pages
S8 - S13
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-0284(200005)6:<S8:CATTFH>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The last 3 years have seen a dramatic fall in mortality and morbidity from HIV infection. Four factors have contributed to this: an improved understan ding of the pathogenesis of HIV infection; the availability of tests that c ould measure plasma viral burden; the development of new and more powerful drugs such as the protease and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibit ors; and the completion of large clinical endpoint trials that conclusively demonstrated that potent antiretroviral combinations significantly delayed the progression of HIV disease and improved survival. Typical antiretrovir al regimen now consist of at least three agents: one or two protease inhibi tors or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combined with two nucleoside analogs. The goal of therapy is to reduce measurable plasma vira l burden to undetectable levels. Viral load testing has made it possible to individualize therapy and to more accurately determine the best time to in itiate or change therapy, long before declining CD4(+) counts would have gi ven evidence of active viral replication. However, despite the impressive p rogress to date, there remain significant shortcomings with current treatme nt. Even with the most potent regimens available, there exists a proportion of patients (perhaps 20-50% of treated individuals) who fail to have compl ete and durable virologic responses to therapy. The shortcomings of current regimens are particularly evident in patients with high plasma HIV-1 RNA l evels, extensive prior treatment, and advanced disease. Complexity, short- and long-term toxicities, cross-resistance, and drug-drug interactions all complicate current regimens. Viral resistance is increasingly encountered i n clinical practice and transmission of resistant virus is well-documented. In addition, there remain concerns about the ability of the virus to evade current therapies, whether in viral reservoirs in non-lymphoid compartment s or in lymphoid tissue, such as resting memory T cells. Thus there remains a need for new therapies as well as new strategies using existing drugs.