Natural rubber latex: Glove use, sensitization, and airborne and latent dust concentrations at a Denver Hospital

Citation
Eh. Page et al., Natural rubber latex: Glove use, sensitization, and airborne and latent dust concentrations at a Denver Hospital, J OCCUP ENV, 42(6), 2000, pp. 613-620
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10762752 → ACNP
Volume
42
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
613 - 620
Database
ISI
SICI code
1076-2752(200006)42:6<613:NRLGUS>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Exposure to natural rubber latex may cause immediate hypersensitivity react ions. Published latex sensitization prevalence rates range from 2.9% to 22% among health care workers, and from 0.12% to about 20% of occupationally u nexposed populations. In this study, self-administered questionnaires addre ssed job and personal characteristics, glove use, and symptoms in two group s of hospital workers: those who regularly used Inter gloves and those who did not. Serum was tested for latex-specific immunoglobulin E. Air, surface , and air-filter dust samples for natural rubber Inter were collected. The prevalence of Inter sensitization was 6.3% in the non-users and 6.1% in the latex glove users (P = 0.9); 81.3% of sensitized workers were atopic compa red with 59.5% of non-sensitized workers (P < 0.05). Reporting of work-rela ted hand dermatitis was more common in the latex glove users (23.4%) than i n the non-users (4.9%), as were rhino-conjunctivitis (16.3% and 7.9%, respe ctively, [P < 0.01]), and hand urticaria (9.9% and 2.1%, respectively, [P < 0.01]). There was no significant difference in work-related symptoms betwe en the sensitized and non-sensitized workers. Environmental concentrations of latex were higher in the work areas of the non-sensitized workers, but h igher in the clinical than in the non-clinical areas. Occupational latex gl ove use was not a risk factor for sensitization.