Mono- and biphasic plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from a 500 mg suppository in healthy male volunteers controlled by the time of defecation before dosing

Citation
Tb. Vree et al., Mono- and biphasic plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from a 500 mg suppository in healthy male volunteers controlled by the time of defecation before dosing, J PHARM PHA, 52(6), 2000, pp. 645-652
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223573 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
645 - 652
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3573(200006)52:6<645:MABPCC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
This study was based on data from a bioequivalence study (n=24) of two diff erent formulations of suppositories containing 500 mg mesalazine (formulati on I and II), with a similar dissolution profile in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 . There was a large intra- and intersubject variability in the plasma conce ntration-time curves of mesalazine from both suppositories. The aim of the investigation was to identify the parameters that caused the observed large variations in release and absorption of mesalazine in the r ectum. Plasma mesalazine and acetylmesalazine, and urine acetylmesalazine concentr ations were determined according to validated methods involving HPLC analys is with coulometric detection. Lower limit of quantitation values were resp ectively 10.4 and 19.4 ng mL(-1) in plasma and 0.96 mu g mL(-1) in urine. T he time of defecation before and after insertion was recorded. There was a clear distinction between subjects who showed monophasic mesala zine release/absorption and those who showed biphasic and more extended rel ease/absorption. With formulation I there was a correlation between time of defecation before dosing and the type of absorption, monophasic and biphas ic absorbers showed a significant difference in the time of defecation, e.g . 9.7 +/-5.6 h vs 18.8 +/- 11.9 h (P = 0.0218). The impact of time of defec ation before dosing was non-significant with formulation II, 16.+/-7.2h vs 15.1 +/- 4.2 h (P = 0.67). The impact of the time elapsed between administr ation and time of defecation after the insertion of the suppository was not significant for the type of release/absorption. The plasma concentration-time curves of the metabolite ran parallel to that of the parent drug, the more parent drug was released/absorbed, the more w as acetylated (P = 0.0013) and excreted into the urine (P = 0.0004). After absorption the compound was metabolized into acetylmesalazine, and renally excreted (12-13% of the dose). Monophasic release/ absorption resulted in 7 .1% metabolite with I and 10.3% with II (P=0.0004), while biphasic release/ absorption gave 16.8% metabolite with I and 15.5% with II. The renal cleara nce of the metabolite acetylmesalazine was independent of the observed defe cation patterns (300 mt min(-1), P > 0.8), stool composition, and type of a bsorption.