Mono- and biphasic plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from a 500 mg suppository in healthy male volunteers controlled by the time of defecation before dosing
Tb. Vree et al., Mono- and biphasic plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from a 500 mg suppository in healthy male volunteers controlled by the time of defecation before dosing, J PHARM PHA, 52(6), 2000, pp. 645-652
This study was based on data from a bioequivalence study (n=24) of two diff
erent formulations of suppositories containing 500 mg mesalazine (formulati
on I and II), with a similar dissolution profile in phosphate buffer pH 6.8
. There was a large intra- and intersubject variability in the plasma conce
ntration-time curves of mesalazine from both suppositories.
The aim of the investigation was to identify the parameters that caused the
observed large variations in release and absorption of mesalazine in the r
ectum.
Plasma mesalazine and acetylmesalazine, and urine acetylmesalazine concentr
ations were determined according to validated methods involving HPLC analys
is with coulometric detection. Lower limit of quantitation values were resp
ectively 10.4 and 19.4 ng mL(-1) in plasma and 0.96 mu g mL(-1) in urine. T
he time of defecation before and after insertion was recorded.
There was a clear distinction between subjects who showed monophasic mesala
zine release/absorption and those who showed biphasic and more extended rel
ease/absorption. With formulation I there was a correlation between time of
defecation before dosing and the type of absorption, monophasic and biphas
ic absorbers showed a significant difference in the time of defecation, e.g
. 9.7 +/-5.6 h vs 18.8 +/- 11.9 h (P = 0.0218). The impact of time of defec
ation before dosing was non-significant with formulation II, 16.+/-7.2h vs
15.1 +/- 4.2 h (P = 0.67). The impact of the time elapsed between administr
ation and time of defecation after the insertion of the suppository was not
significant for the type of release/absorption.
The plasma concentration-time curves of the metabolite ran parallel to that
of the parent drug, the more parent drug was released/absorbed, the more w
as acetylated (P = 0.0013) and excreted into the urine (P = 0.0004). After
absorption the compound was metabolized into acetylmesalazine, and renally
excreted (12-13% of the dose). Monophasic release/ absorption resulted in 7
.1% metabolite with I and 10.3% with II (P=0.0004), while biphasic release/
absorption gave 16.8% metabolite with I and 15.5% with II. The renal cleara
nce of the metabolite acetylmesalazine was independent of the observed defe
cation patterns (300 mt min(-1), P > 0.8), stool composition, and type of a
bsorption.