Objective: To show that resuscitation from hypothermic, hemorrhagic shock u
sing 65 degrees C intravenous fluid results in a more rapid return to euthe
rmia compared with 40 degrees C intravenous fluid, without significant endo
thelial or hemolytic injury.
Design: Fourteen anesthetized beagles (10-12 kg) were cooled to a core temp
erature of 30 degrees C and hemorrhaged to a mean arterial pressure of 40 t
o 45 mm Hg for 30 minutes. The animals were randomized to receive either 65
degrees C or 10 degrees C intravenous fluid through a specially designed c
atheter at a rate of 80% of their blood volume per hour until euthermic (37
degrees C) or for 2 hours.
Materials and Methods: Blood pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, heart rat
e, and core temperature were continuously monitored. Blood samples were col
lected at baseline, after hemorrhage, 2 hours of resuscitation, and at post
mortem examination after 7 days of survival. Laboratory measurements includ
ed complete blood count, plasma-free hemoglobin, and osmotic fragility. Val
ues were compared using the Student's paired or unpaired t test with p simi
lar to 0.05 indicating significance. Postmortem examination included light
microscopy of the proximal superior vena cava or right atrium,
Results: Animals receiving 65 degrees C intravenous fluid warmed 3.6 degree
s C/hour, significantly faster than the 40 degrees C animals (1,9 degrees C
/hour), There were no significant differences in plasma-free hemoglobin or
osmotic fragility. Endothelial injuries were found in two animals in each g
roup, These defects occurred along the path of catheter insertion and not a
t the infusion site,
Conclusions: Central intravenous fluid at 65 degrees C is a more rapid mean
s of treating hypothermia than standard 40 degrees C intravenous fluid, It
is safe even in hypothermia animals.