Hf. Morrison et al., ELECTROMAGNETIC MAPPING OF ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY BENEATH THE COLUMBIA BASALTS, Geophysical prospecting, 44(6), 1996, pp. 963-986
Sedimentary rocks beneath the Columbia River Basalt Group are recogniz
ed as having potential for oil and gas production, but the overlying l
ayered basalts effectively mask seismic reflections from the underlyin
g sediments. Four electromagnetic (EM) methods have been applied on pr
ofiles crossing Boylston Ridge, a typical east-west trending anticline
of the Yakima Fold Belt, in an attempt to map the resistivity interfa
ce between the basalts and the sediments and to map variations in stru
cture and resistivity within the sediments. The EM surveys detected st
rong variations in resistivity within the basalts, and in particular t
he continuous magnetotelluric array profiling (EMAP) revealed resistiv
ity lows beneath the surface anticlines. These low resistivity zones p
robably coincide with fracturing in the core of the anticlines and the
y appear to correlate well with similar zones of low seismic velocity
observed on a nearby seismic profile. The controlled-source EM surveys
(in-loop transient, long-offset transient, and variable-offset freque
ncy-domain) were designed in anticipation of relatively uniform high r
esistivity basalts, and were found to have been seriously distorted by
the intrabasalt conductors discovered in the field. In particular, th
e resistivity sections derived from 1D inversions were found to be inc
onsistent and misleading. The EMAP survey provided the most informatio
n about the subsurface resistivity distribution, and was certainly the
most cost-effective. However, both controlled-source and EMAP surveys
call for accurate 2D or 3D inversion to accommodate the geological ob
jectives of this project.