Use of electrical conductivity to predict water-holding capacity in post-rigor pork

Citation
S. Lee et al., Use of electrical conductivity to predict water-holding capacity in post-rigor pork, MEAT SCI, 55(4), 2000, pp. 385-389
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
MEAT SCIENCE
ISSN journal
03091740 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
385 - 389
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-1740(200008)55:4<385:UOECTP>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
This study was designed to re-examine the interrelationships among ultimate pH (pH(mu)), electrical conductivity (EC) and water-holding capacity (WHC) , and to test if EC, using one of two EC instruments, and pH(u) can be used to predict WHC. The % drip (PD) was used as measure of WHC. Forty-seven po rk loins were classified either as PSE (pale, soft, exudative), RSE (reddis h-pink, soft, exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm, non-exudative) or DFD (d ark, firm, dry), based on L* values, PD and pH(u) The measurement of EC, co nducted using the instrument developed at the University of Wisconsin-Madis on (UW-EC) was highly correlated to PD at 24 h post mortem (CD = 66%), but the pH (NWK) measure of EC was not as highly related to WHC as UW-EC. The p redictive value of pH(u), and EC for WHC were similar. When 47 samples were divided into three different groups, such as low (< 2% drip), medium (2-6% drip) and high (> 6% drip) drip loss, UW-EC alone grouped 80% of the sampl es correctly. Thus, EC seemed to be an accurate predictor of WHC in pork mu scle when measured at 24 h post mortem. It is conceivable that EC can be us ed independently, or with even better success in combination with pH(u),, t o classify WHC of pork carcasses. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.