Secondary surgery after failure of primary treatment is a promising and rea
sonable option only for patients with a relapse-free interval of at least 6
-12 months who should have ideally achieved a tumor-free status after prima
ry therapy. As after primary surgery, size of residual tumor is the most si
gnificant predictor of survival after secondary surgery. Even in the case o
f multiple tumor sites, complete removal of the tumor can be achieved in ne
arly 30% of the patients. Treatment results are much better in specialized
oncology centers with optimal interdisciplinary cooperation compared with s
maller institutions. Chemotherapy can be used both for consolidation after
successful secondary surgery and for palliation in patients with inoperable
recurrent disease. Since paclitaxel has been integrated into first-line ch
emotherapy, there is no defined standard for second-line chemotherapy. Seve
ral cytotoxic agents have shown moderate activity in this setting, includin
g treosulfan, epirubicin, and newer agents such as topotecan, gemcitabine,
vinorelbine, and PEG(polyethylene glycol)-liposomal doxorubicin. Thus, the
German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie (AGO) has initiated sev
eral randomized studies in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in order
to define new standards for second-line chemotherapy.