OPTHAZOP - AN EFFECTIVE AND OPTIMUM APPROACH FOR HAZOP STUDY

Authors
Citation
Fi. Khan et Sa. Abbasi, OPTHAZOP - AN EFFECTIVE AND OPTIMUM APPROACH FOR HAZOP STUDY, Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 10(3), 1997, pp. 191-204
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Chemical
ISSN journal
09504230
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
191 - 204
Database
ISI
SICI code
0950-4230(1997)10:3<191:O-AEAO>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Qualitative hazard assessment is part of the detailed risk analysis of chemical process industries and a hazard and operability (HAZOP) stud y is the best technique to carry out this step. It is a systematic stu dy conducted by a team of experts of different disciplines to identify and assess hazards using brainstorming discussion of deviation In ope rational parameters from normal/standard conditions. This study needs high levels of expertise and substantial time commitments. The various steps involved in any typical HAZOP (application of deviation, cause finding, and consequence analysis of each and every line and equipment ) need a sustained high level of mental performance and alertness for a long span of time, but the repetitious nature of these steps inevita bly generates a feeling of drudgery and mental fatigue, even exhaustio n. This may not only reduce the effectiveness of HAZOP, but even rende r it incomplete or erroneous. This paper is devoted to a discussion ab out the factors that have direct influence on the efficiency, effectiv eness and reliability of such studies. It also suggests an optimal app roach to HAZOP study procedures (optHAZOP) based on the utilization of an already developed information base. The optHAZOP technique reduces the mental execution load of experts by a half, and thus provides mor e time to study typical hazardous units and conceptualize better contr ol strategies. This technique takes around 45% less time than that of the conventional HAZOP study procedure (estimated using CPM networking and time analysis of different steps of study) with better efficiency and effectiveness. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved .