In this paper, second-order factor analysis is compared with a first-order
additive model (complete model) traditionally used to analyse convergent an
d discriminant validity. A simulation study was performed with the complete
model and the second order model as data generators, using multitrait-mult
imethod matrices with three traits and three methods. Conditions of the stu
dy included several indicators per trait-method combination. Manipulated va
riables included sample size (200 and 1000) and correlation among method fa
ctors (0..2,.4,.6) and the estimated confirmatory model (complete model and
second order model). 100 replications were used in each condition. Depende
nt variables under scrutiny were: a)convergence problems, whether or not th
e model converged; b) ill-defined solutions; c) bias in the estimation of t
rait factor loadings (convergent validity) and trait correlations (discrimi
nant validity); and d) the root mean square error in the estimation of the
trait factor loadings and trait correlations. Results shown the superiority
of the complete model over the second order confirmatory factor analysis.
The second order model presented so many estimation problems that almost di
scard it as an alternative over the first order models in order to analyse
multitrait-multimethod matrices included in this study.