Special child hearsay statutes allow for the admissibility of demonstrably
reliable but. otherwise inadmissible children's hearsay. These statutes wer
e among other child witness innovations that proliferated in the 1980s and
1990s to redress the proof problems that arise in child sexual abuse prosec
utions. The author argues that the special child hearsay statutes are at on
ce over-inclusive and under-inclusive: over-inclusive in that child sexual
abuse prosecutions typically include the testimony of the child witness and
multiple hearsay witnesses; and under-inclusive in that they allow for the
admissibility of children's hearsay in child abuse cases but may require t
he child declarant to be the child victim, excluding the hearsay statements
of other child witnesses, and typically do not apply to the hearsay statem
ents of children who witness crimes other than child abuse, like domestic v
iolence. She proposes reforms to remedy these deficiencies in the special c
hild hearsay statutes.