This article presents two studies examining (1) the relationship between Pe
rson-Manager (P-M) fit and managerial advancement of women and men with, an
d without managerial aspirations and (2) the P-M fit as related to manageri
al and non-managerial women. The P-M fit was assessed by computing the cong
ruence between participants' self-rated personality profile and the perceiv
ed personality profile of a manager. Sex (men show a higher P-M fit than wo
men), gender (the higher the individual's masculine gender-role, the higher
the P-M fit) and group (managers and managerial aspirants show a higher P-
M fit than non-managerial aspirants and non-managers) hypotheses were teste
d. There was no support for the sex difference hypothesis. However, the gro
up and gender hypotheses were confirmed showing that managers and manageria
l aspirants had a higher P-M fit than non-managers and non-aspirants. Furth
er, analyses revealed that the higher the participants' masculinity scores,
the higher the P-M fit. implications of these findings are discussed in re
lation to the gendered image of the managerial role and adaptation theory.