I. Keskimaki et al., Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery - A population-based study of regional and interspecialty variations, SPINE, 25(12), 2000, pp. 1500-1507
Study Design. A follow-up study using nationwide administrative databases.
Objectives. To explore rates of reoperation after lumbar disc surgery and t
heir regional and interspecialty variations.
Summary of Background Data. In many Western countries, rates of lumbar disc
surgery display significant geographic variations suggesting varying treat
ment criteria among operating surgeons. Few population-based studies have e
xplored the risk of reoperation after disc surgery, and regional or intersp
ecialty variations in the reoperations are unknown.
Methods. Patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery from January 1, 1987 t
hrough December 31, 1995, were identified in the Finnish Hospital Discharge
Register. Data an the patients' initial disc operations, subsequent operat
ions, and cause-of-death records were linked using personal identification
codes. The Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazard model were used to a
nalyze risks of reoperation after initial surgery, according to hospital ca
tchment area rates of disc surgery and for neurosurgical and orthopedic pat
ients of university hospitals.
Results. 12.3% of 25,359 surgical patients with herniated lumbar discs unde
rwent subsequent lumbar operations corresponding to the cumulative risk of
18.9% in the 9-year follow-up. Reoperation rates increased during the study
period with the recent patient cohorts exhibiting risks. The reoperation r
isk showed a systematic geographic variation: the higher the regional disc
surgery rate, the higher the reoperation risk. Overall, neurosurgical patie
nts had a higher reoperation risk than orthopedic patients (relative risk [
RR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.17-2.10), but this was not a uni
form finding.
Conclusions. The reoperation risk after disc surgery increased during the s
tudy period and was higher in hospital catchment areas with higher overall
discectomy rates. The reoperation risks varied among the university hospita
ls but tended to be higher for neurosurgical rather than for orthopedic pat
ients.