Radiation exposure during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine

Citation
Dpg. Jones et al., Radiation exposure during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine, SPINE, 25(12), 2000, pp. 1538-1541
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1538 - 1541
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(20000615)25:12<1538:REDFAP>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Study Design. An experimental model to assess radiation exposure during lum bar pedicle screw insertion. Objectives. To measure skin (patient) and scatter (surgeon) doses of radiat ion during lumbar spine fluoroscopy to assess safety of the procedure for b oth the surgeon and patient and determine best practice; Summary of Background Data. Fluoroscopy assists with accuracy of pedicle sc rew placement, yet the optimal technique of C-arm use and risk to both pati ent and operating room staff from radiation exposure are unknown. Methods. Entry- and scatter-dose recordings were made using a digital dosim eter while screening an anthropomorphic phantom prone on a radiolucent oper ating table. The source was positioned both superiorly and inferiorly with the height varied in the latter orientation to create a working space under the C-arm. The senior author's fluoroscopy records were reviewed in 140 co nsecutive cases. Results. In a series of 140 patients who underwent pedicle screw fixation, the fluoroscopy time was 1.4 minutes per case or 0.33 minutes per screw. In the source-superior position, the effective dose received by the patient w as approximately 2.3 mSv per case. In the source-inferior position with a w orking space of 300 mm, the effective dose was 6.8 mSv. Scatter dose to the surgeon was higher in the source-superior position but was still less than 10% of recommended limits for the hand, thyroid, and eyes. Conclusions. The source-superior position is the preferred position for ped icle screw screening if a working space is required. Patient exposure is mi nimized, and surgeon dose is well within current recommendations.