Background: The use of modern irradiation techniques requires better verifi
cation films for determining set-up deviations and patient movements during
the course of radiation treatment. This is an investigation of the image q
uality and time requirement of a new verification film system compared to a
conventional portal film system.
Material and Methods: For conventional verifications we used Agfa Curix HT
1000 films which were compared to the new Kodak EC-L film system. 344 Agfa
Curix HT 1000 and 381 Kodak EC-L portal films of different tumor sites (pro
state, rectum, head and neck) were visually judged on a light box by 2 expe
rienced physicians. Subjective judgement of image quality, masking of films
and time requirement were checked.
Results In this investigation 65% of 175 Kodak EC-L ap/pa-films were judged
"good", only 18% were classified "moderate" or "poor" 14%, but only 22% of
173 conventional ap/pa verification films (Agfa Curirx HT 1000) were judge
d to be ''good".
Conclusions: The image quality, detail perception and time required for fil
m inspection of the new Kodak EC-L film system was significantly improved w
hen compared with standard portal films. They could be read more accurately
and the detection of set-up deviation was facilitated.