Bioremediation in field box plots of a soil contaminated with wood-preservatives: A comparison of treatment conditions using toxicity testing as a monitoring technique
Tm. Phillips et al., Bioremediation in field box plots of a soil contaminated with wood-preservatives: A comparison of treatment conditions using toxicity testing as a monitoring technique, WATER A S P, 121(1-4), 2000, pp. 173-187
A soil contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum hydroc
arbons and chlorophenols was bioremediated in field box plots. Three differ
ent bioremediation treatments (tillage and irrigation alone (box plot 2) or
in addition to amendment with nitrogen and phosphorus (box plots 3 and 4)
and additional organic amendment composed of agricultural crop residues (bo
x plot 4)) were compared using chemical analysis for target contaminants an
d six toxicity tests (seed germination, earthworm survival, SOS Chromotest,
Toxi-Chromotest, solid-phase Microtox(R) and red blood cell (RBC) haemolys
is assay). Degradation was enhanced, and toxicity was generally the most re
duced, in box plots 3 and 4. Although chemical analysis indicated that the
two amendment protocols were equally effective, soil toxicity was generally
the most reduced in box plot 4. The earthworm survival and seed germinatio
n assays were the most reliable and relevant toxicity tests. Difficulties a
rising with the other tests included insensitivity to changes in soil conta
minant levels, inconsistency and interference by soil particles and other s
oil constituents. Because of the lack of agreement between toxicity tests,
these results support the use of a battery of toxicity tests in conjunction
with chemical analysis, when assessing the efficacy of bioremediation.