Non-partisan, as defined here, refers to an evaluation that is and is regar
ded;by partisans of all persuasions as balanced, fair, and faithful, so tha
t if methodological quality is high, debates focus on the implications of t
he findings for practice or policy, not on the credibility of the findings
themselves, This paper examines, from an historical perspective, what strat
egies have been used to achieve non-partisan evaluation, how well these hav
e worked, and whether, however hard we try, there is a limit after which ou
r virtue is unrewarded.