Formal models of political bargaining generally emphasize the importance of
the allocation of prerogatives such as proposal and veto rights among the
bargainers, However, despite the importance of these arguments for the stud
y of political institutions, little work has been done to clarify precisely
what general roles each of these prerogatives play in generating political
outcomes. In this article, I develop a sequential-choice bargaining model
that incorporates very general allocations of both proposal and veto rights
. The model helps clarify the important strategic distinctions between thes
e rights and identify the conditions under which they have substantial impa
cts on outcomes. My analysis demonstrates how these prerogatives interact a
nd how the failure to account for this interaction can lead to mistaken inf
erences about their individual effects. Finally, the model suggests that th
e value of these rights is heavily influenced by a number of other features
of the institutional bargaining environment.