The rapidity of drug dose escalation influences blood pressure response and adverse effects burden in patients with hypertension - The Quinapril Titration Interval Management Evaluation (ATIME) study

Citation
Jm. Flack et al., The rapidity of drug dose escalation influences blood pressure response and adverse effects burden in patients with hypertension - The Quinapril Titration Interval Management Evaluation (ATIME) study, ARCH IN MED, 160(12), 2000, pp. 1842-1847
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
160
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1842 - 1847
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(20000626)160:12<1842:TRODDE>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background: Antihypertensive medication doses are typically increased withi n several weeks after initiation of therapy because of inadequate blood pre ssure (BP) control and/or adverse effects. Methods: We conducted a parallel-group clinical trial with 2935 subjects (5 3% women, n=1547) aged 21 to 75 years, with Joint National Committee on Pre vention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure VI sta ges 1 to 2 hypertension, recruited from 365 physician practices in the sout heastern United States. Participants were randomized either to a fast (ever y 2 weeks; n=1727) or slow (every 6 weeks; n=1208) drug titration. Therapy with quinapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, was initiated a t 20 mg once daily. The dose was doubled at the next 2 clinic visits until the BP was lower than 140/90 mm Hg or a dose of 80 mg was reached. Results: Pretreatment BP averaged 152/95 mm Hg. Patients with stage 2 hyper tension reported more symptoms than those with stage 1. The BP averaged 140 /86, 137/84, and 134/83 mm Hg in the slow group compared with 141/88, 137/8 5, and 135/84 mm Hg in the fastgroup at the 3 respective clinic visits. The BP control rates to lower than 140/90 mm Hg at the 3 clinic visits were (s low, fast, respectively) 41.3%, 35.7% (P<.001); 54.3%, 51.5% (P=.16); and 6 8%, 62.3% (P=.02). in the fast group, 10.7% of participants experienced adv erse events vs 10.8% in the slow group; however, 21.0%, of adverse events i n the fast group were "serious" vs only 12%; in the slow group. Conclusion: Slower dose escalation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inh ibitor quinapril provides higher BP control rates and fewer serious adverse events than more rapid drug dose escalation.