Morbidity and outcome after mechanical ventricular support using thoratec,novacor, and HeartMate for bridging to heart transplantation

Citation
K. Minami et al., Morbidity and outcome after mechanical ventricular support using thoratec,novacor, and HeartMate for bridging to heart transplantation, ARTIF ORGAN, 24(6), 2000, pp. 421-426
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
ISSN journal
0160564X → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
421 - 426
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-564X(200006)24:6<421:MAOAMV>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Between September 1989 and June 1999, 228 patients were supported with a ve ntricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation. In this study , the results of implantation were evaluated in patients supported with one type of device, including 85 supported with a Thoratec, 61 with a Novacor, and 37 with a HeartMate. The mean support time was 49, 148, and 124 days, respectively. Successful transplantation and weaning rates were 64.7% with Thoratec, 59.0% with Novacor, and 62.0% with HeartMate. Cerebral embolism a nd drive-line and pocket infection were major causes of postoperative morbi dity and mortality. We recommended that a Thoratec system be employed as a bridge to heart transplantation for patients with biventricular heart failu re, and that a Novacor or HeartMate system be implanted in patients requiri ng a long-term circulatory support.