Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones?

Citation
Jdc. Linnell et al., Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones?, BIODIVERS C, 9(7), 2000, pp. 857-868
Citations number
67
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
ISSN journal
09603115 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
857 - 868
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-3115(200007)9:7<857:COBISB>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Large carnivores are often used as focal species (indicators, umbrellas, fl agships or keystones) in conservation strategies either aimed at conserving carnivores, the rest of the biodiversity that occupies their habitats, or both. We evaluate their suitability for these roles in the context of borea l forest biodiversity conservation in the muti-use landscapes of Scandinavi a. The enormous conflicts, especially with livestock, that carnivores cause in these areas makes them very controversial flagships to the extent that it may affect rural people's attitudes to conservation in general. Because of the broad habitat tolerance of large carnivores and their prey, and the difficulties in surveying carnivore numbers, they are very insensitive and impractical indicators of forest biodiversity. This ability of large carniv ores to thrive in industrial forests means that the many species that are s ensitive to modern forestry will not fall under the umbrella of areas manag ed for large carnivores. If large carnivores have a keystone function with respect to affecting the density of their ungulate prey it is likely to lea d to even further conflicts with hunters who gain economic benefit from har vesting wild ungulates. In other words, none of the classic 'ecological' ar guments are likely to help justify large carnivore conservation, and large carnivore conservation is unlikely to help conserve the rest of the boreal forest's biodiversity. Based on these arguments we recommend that (1) justi fication for large carnivore conservation focus on the real philosophical a nd value orientated reasons rather than ecological justifications, (2) that this conservation should be brought about in practice by dedicated managem ent programs that specifically address the conflicts caused by large carniv ores, and (3) that boreal forest biodiversity is best conserved by specific actions designed to establish reserves or change forestry practices.