Jdc. Linnell et al., Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones?, BIODIVERS C, 9(7), 2000, pp. 857-868
Large carnivores are often used as focal species (indicators, umbrellas, fl
agships or keystones) in conservation strategies either aimed at conserving
carnivores, the rest of the biodiversity that occupies their habitats, or
both. We evaluate their suitability for these roles in the context of borea
l forest biodiversity conservation in the muti-use landscapes of Scandinavi
a. The enormous conflicts, especially with livestock, that carnivores cause
in these areas makes them very controversial flagships to the extent that
it may affect rural people's attitudes to conservation in general. Because
of the broad habitat tolerance of large carnivores and their prey, and the
difficulties in surveying carnivore numbers, they are very insensitive and
impractical indicators of forest biodiversity. This ability of large carniv
ores to thrive in industrial forests means that the many species that are s
ensitive to modern forestry will not fall under the umbrella of areas manag
ed for large carnivores. If large carnivores have a keystone function with
respect to affecting the density of their ungulate prey it is likely to lea
d to even further conflicts with hunters who gain economic benefit from har
vesting wild ungulates. In other words, none of the classic 'ecological' ar
guments are likely to help justify large carnivore conservation, and large
carnivore conservation is unlikely to help conserve the rest of the boreal
forest's biodiversity. Based on these arguments we recommend that (1) justi
fication for large carnivore conservation focus on the real philosophical a
nd value orientated reasons rather than ecological justifications, (2) that
this conservation should be brought about in practice by dedicated managem
ent programs that specifically address the conflicts caused by large carniv
ores, and (3) that boreal forest biodiversity is best conserved by specific
actions designed to establish reserves or change forestry practices.