Eddy covariance measurements on mountain slopes: The advantage of surface-normal sensor orientation over a vertical set-up

Citation
P. Geissbuhler et al., Eddy covariance measurements on mountain slopes: The advantage of surface-normal sensor orientation over a vertical set-up, BOUND-LAY M, 96(3), 2000, pp. 371-392
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY
ISSN journal
00068314 → ACNP
Volume
96
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
371 - 392
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8314(200009)96:3<371:ECMOMS>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The measurement of scalar fluxes employing the eddy covariance method is a widely used experimental approach, for which the flow distortion due to obs tacles (e.g., sensor mounts and mast) is a well-known but not fully solved problem. In order to reduce flow distortion we installed a sonic anemometer in a surface-normal orientation relative to the terrain slope, and a secon d instrument in a vertical position at a horizontal distance of 1.54 m from the first instrument We found a significant reduction in the rotation angle necessary for the co ordinate rotation procedure in the x-z plane when computing 30-minute flux averages with the surface-normal orientation. In 91% of all cases this rota tion angle remained within the angle of incidence of +/- 10 degrees recomme nded by the manufacturer. In contrast, only 24% of the measurements taken w ith the vertically mounted anemometer were obtained at an angle of incidenc e within +/- 10 degrees, and 3% were outside the +/- 30 degrees range speci fied for an acceptable operation. A data quality test based on the variance of vertical wind speed normalized with friction velocity (sigma(w)/u(*)) revealed problems for application u nder stable conditions due to large uncertainties in the determination of t he Monin-Obukhov stability parameter z/L. An alternative test using the bul k drag coefficient C-D revealed other problems related to the dependence of C-D on z/z(0), the measuring height normalized by the roughness length, wh ich do not appear to be constant in complex terrain. With both tests, a ten dency for a slightly improved data quality was found for the surface normal set-up, which, however, proved statistically insignificant. It is concluded that the surface-normal set-up of a sonic anemometer signif icantly reduces flow distortion by the sensor head. Although the surface-no rmal mounting position therefore appears to be the preferred one, with decr eased flow distortion and a slightly improved data quality, no significant differences in turbulent quantities were found between the two set-up posit ions. Hence, the consequences for short-term measurements of mass and energ y fluxes with a surface-normal set-up in complex terrain appear to be relev ant only if single flux events are to be inspected, while for long-term mea surements of integrated fluxes both the surface-normal and vertical install ation of the sonic anemometer are adequate, indicating that eddy covariance measurements in complex terrain are less delicate than expected.