Jw. Fanton et al., Cardiovascular responses to propofol and etomidate in long-term instrumented rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), COMPAR MED, 50(3), 2000, pp. 303-308
Background and Purpose: Cardiac and arterial responses to prescribed doses
of propofol and etomidate in rhesus monkeys were compared.
Methods: Intravenously administered induction doses of propofol (2 mg/kg of
body weight) or etomidate (1 mg/kg) followed by continuous intravenous inf
usions of propofol (200 mu g/kg/min) or etomidate (100 mu g/kg/min) were ad
ministered. Left ventricular and right atrial access catheters were implant
ed for long-term use, along with a transit-time flow probe on the ascending
aorta, and pericardial electrocardiogram leads. A dual sensor 3-F microman
ometer was used to measure left ventricular pressure and aortic pressure, a
nd an active redirectional transit-time probe measured aortic flow. Noorder
graaf's four-element model was used to estimate total peripheral resistance
and systemic arterial compliance.
Results: Significant (P < 0.01) decreases in mean arterial pressure, heart
rate, and myocardial contractility were accompanied by an increase in syste
mic arterial compliance associated with propofol and etomidate, Only minima
l changes in left ventricular diastolic pressure, cardiac output, stroke vo
lume, and total peripheral resistance were found for both drugs. The change
s associated with propofol are comparable to results in human beings, where
as the changes associated with etomidate did not agree with results of publ
ished human studies.
Conclusion: The significant cardiovascular alterations associated with both
agents were attributed to reductions in heart rate, although the possibili
ty exists that negative inotropic effects may have had a role.