OBJECTIVE - This independent study was designed to determine the accuracy o
f 10-g monofilaments manufactured and supplied by popular commercial compan
ies.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 160 new 10-g monofilaments (30 Sem
mes-Weinstein monofilaments [North Coast Medical], 30 Timesco/Sensory Testi
ng Systems monofilaments, 50 Owen Mumford Neuropens, and 50 Bailey Instrume
nts monofilaments) were tested using a calibrated load cell. Each monofilam
ent was subjected to 10 mechanical bucklings of 10 mm while the load cell d
etected the maximum buckling force, Longevity testing was performed on a su
bset of the monofilaments by subjecting them to continuous compressions unt
il the buckling force was <9 g.
RESULTS - The accuracy of monofilaments to produce a buckling force of 10 g
varies among manufacturers. Bailey Instruments and Owen Mumford filaments
were the most accurate with 100% buckling within +/-1.0 g of 10 g. Only 70%
of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments from North Coast Medical buckled wit
hin +/-1.0 g of 10 g. A total of 80% of Timesco filaments buckled at <8 g.
Longevity tests on Bailey Instruments and Owen Mumford monofilaments demons
trated that 80% continued to buckle within 10% of 10 g after 100 compressio
ns, but only 50% were within this range after 200 compressions. The maximum
amount of recovery achieved in any monofilament occurred within 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS - Monofilaments made by either Bailey Instruments or Owen Mumfo
rd are recommended for use in clinical practice. North Coast Medical monofi
laments may operate differently in the U.S. because of different environmen
tal conditions such as differences in humidity. Timesco/Sensory Testing Sys
tems monofilaments were neither accurate enough nor Conformity European mar
ked to recommend their use in the U.K. Longevity and recovery testing sugge
st that each monofilament will survive usage on similar to 10 patients befo
re needing a recovery time of 24 h before further use.