R. Goswami et al., Insulin antibody response to bovine insulin therapy: functional significance among insulin requiring young diabetics in India, DIABET RE C, 49(1), 2000, pp. 7-15
The majority of young diabetics in India prefer to use low-cost bovine insu
lin for economic reasons. Therefore, the question of insulin antibody respo
nse to bovine insulin and its functional significance is still relevant in
the Indian context. We assessed insulin antibody response in 52 young diabe
tics (type 1, n = 25, malnutrition modulated form of diabetes, n = 19 and f
ibrocalculous pancreatopathy (FCP) n = 8) on bovine insulin therapy (mean d
uration 3.0 +/- 2.1 years) using an internationally standardised in-house r
adioligand assay. The functional significance of insulin antibody was asses
sed by calculating their affinity constant, maximum binding capacity and to
tal insulin binding power by Scatchard analysis (type 1, n=14, malnutrition
modulated form of diabetes, n= 11). All the patients treated with bovine i
nsulin showed high titers of insulin antibodies with S.D. score ranging fro
m 5.1 to 42.0. No significant difference was observed in the mean S.D. scor
e of insulin antibodies in the three diabetic groups. The mean daily insuli
n dose, maximum insulin binding capacity and total insulin binding power we
re significantly higher in type 1 when compared to the malnutrition modulat
ed form of diabetes (36 +/- 8 vs. 26 +/- 11 IU/day, P < 0.05; 9.7 +/- 7.8 v
s. 4.0 +/- 3.9 nmol/l, P = 0.03 and 59 +/- 29 vs. 29 +/- 43, P = 0.01, resp
ectively). Insulin antibodies S.D. score and its affinity did not show sign
ificant relationship with daily insulin dose and glycemic control (HbAl) at
admission. Only 24 +/- 7% variations in daily insulin requirement were acc
ounted for by total insulin binding power. There was a significant inverse
relationship between insulin antibody S.D. score and duration of insulin th
erapy (r = - 0.4172, P < 0.0004). To conclude, insulin antibody response fo
llowing bovine insulin therapy is not different among type 1, malnutrition
modulated form of diabetes and FCP diabetes. The insulin antibody response
to bovine insulin therapy does not contribute significantly to increase in
daily insulin requirement in bovine insulin treated insulin requiring young
diabetics. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.