How important is the crustacean plankton for the maintenance of water clarity in shallow lakes with abundant submerged vegetation?

1. We measured the abundance and biomass of filter-feeding microcrustacean zooplankton and calculated their grazing impact on phytoplankton biomass du ring summer in five shallow, mesotrophic to eutrophic lakes. For three of t he lakes data exist both from years with dense submerged vegetation and low turbidity (the clearwater state), as well as from years characterised by s parse vegetation and high turbidity (the turbid state). In the other two la kes data are available only for clearwater conditions. 2. In all lakes conditions of dense vegetation and clear water coincided wi th a low abundance of crustacean plankton during summer. In the three lakes that shifted, the calculated biovolume ingested by crustacean plankton (fi ltering rate) was 3-11 times lower during clearwater conditions compared wi th turbid conditions. Because phytoplankton biomass was lower during clearw ater conditions, however, daily grazing pressure from microcrustacea (expre ssed as percentage of phytoplankton biomass) did not differ between states. In three of the five lakes, grazers were estimated to take less than 10% o f the phytoplankton biomass per day, indicating filtration by zooplankton w as not the most important mechanism to maintain clearwater conditions. 3. High densities of Cladocera were found in three of the lakes within dens e stands of Charophyta. However, these samples were dominated by plant-asso ciated taxa that even during the night were rarely found outside the vegeta tion. This indicates that plant-associated zooplankton has no major influen ce on the maintenance of water clarity outside the vegetation. 4. Spring peak abundance of Cladocera was observed in three of the lakes. I n two of these, where seasonal development was studied in both the clearwat er and the turbid state, spring peaks were lower during the clearwater stat e. 5. Predation, low food availability or a combination of both may explain th e low zooplankton densities. Phytoplankton may be limited by low phosphorus availability in the lakes dominated by Charophyta. Our results indicate th at the importance of zooplankton grazing may have minor importance for the maintenance of the clearwater state in lakes with dense, well-established s ubmerged vegetation.