Effects of arrival time errors on traveltime tomography

Citation
Ahe. Rohm et al., Effects of arrival time errors on traveltime tomography, GEOPHYS J I, 142(1), 2000, pp. 270-276
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0956540X → ACNP
Volume
142
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
270 - 276
Database
ISI
SICI code
0956-540X(200007)142:1<270:EOATEO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The ISC Bulletin is the most widely used data set for traveltime tomography since it comprises the largest collection of arrival times. The large numb er of stations and events gives the best ray path coverage of the Earth's m antle currently available, but the data also contain a considerable amount of noise. The effects of noise are supposedly reduced by averaging delay ti mes for similar paths, choosing a suitable parametrization and damping the tomographic inversions. In this article we focus on two types of errors in body wave arrival times and estimate their effects on global tomographic mo dels using synthetic tests. The first type of error stems from the finite r eading precision of arrival times and is equivalent to a round-off error. T his yields a random contribution to delay times. We show that the reading p recision inferred here often does not coincide with that reported in the Bu lletin. The influence on tomography of a reading precision of 1 s or better is almost insignificant since (1) its variance is very small compared to t he total variance of ISC delay times and (2) less than 5 per cent of that v ariance maps into the tomographic model. A few stations report some arrival times with an indicated reading precision of 0.1 s that are in reality onl y picked to the closest 10 s or 1 min. This results in a S/N ratio much low er than 1 and these data should be removed. The second type of error causes systematic variations of delay times as a function of time. A large amount of this error maps into the tomographic model, but, luckily, the size of t he error in the input data is one order of magnitude smaller than the stand ard deviation of the ISC delay times. A test reveals that the rms amplitude due to these systematic errors is between 4.2 per cent (0-35 km depth) and 14.4 per cent (1800-2000 km depth) of the model rms amplitude. This blurs the tomographic model to some degree but does not change the overall amplit ude or shape of seismic anomalies.