The ISC Bulletin is the most widely used data set for traveltime tomography
since it comprises the largest collection of arrival times. The large numb
er of stations and events gives the best ray path coverage of the Earth's m
antle currently available, but the data also contain a considerable amount
of noise. The effects of noise are supposedly reduced by averaging delay ti
mes for similar paths, choosing a suitable parametrization and damping the
tomographic inversions. In this article we focus on two types of errors in
body wave arrival times and estimate their effects on global tomographic mo
dels using synthetic tests. The first type of error stems from the finite r
eading precision of arrival times and is equivalent to a round-off error. T
his yields a random contribution to delay times. We show that the reading p
recision inferred here often does not coincide with that reported in the Bu
lletin. The influence on tomography of a reading precision of 1 s or better
is almost insignificant since (1) its variance is very small compared to t
he total variance of ISC delay times and (2) less than 5 per cent of that v
ariance maps into the tomographic model. A few stations report some arrival
times with an indicated reading precision of 0.1 s that are in reality onl
y picked to the closest 10 s or 1 min. This results in a S/N ratio much low
er than 1 and these data should be removed. The second type of error causes
systematic variations of delay times as a function of time. A large amount
of this error maps into the tomographic model, but, luckily, the size of t
he error in the input data is one order of magnitude smaller than the stand
ard deviation of the ISC delay times. A test reveals that the rms amplitude
due to these systematic errors is between 4.2 per cent (0-35 km depth) and
14.4 per cent (1800-2000 km depth) of the model rms amplitude. This blurs
the tomographic model to some degree but does not change the overall amplit
ude or shape of seismic anomalies.