PULMONARY CELL-KINETICS AND MORPHOMETRY AFTER OZONE EXPOSURE - DAY VERSUS NIGHT AND DOSE-RESPONSE IN RATS

Citation
H. Witschi et al., PULMONARY CELL-KINETICS AND MORPHOMETRY AFTER OZONE EXPOSURE - DAY VERSUS NIGHT AND DOSE-RESPONSE IN RATS, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 16(6), 1997, pp. 1152-1160
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
10400605
Volume
16
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1152 - 1160
Database
ISI
SICI code
1040-0605(1997)16:6<1152:PCAMAO>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to increasing concentrations of ozone as follows: 0.12, 0.24, 0.36, 0.6, or 0.8 ppm. Controls were kep t in chambers ventilated with filtered air. One-half of the animals in ozone was exposed for 12 h a day during daytime hours, and the other one-half of the animals was exposed for 12 h during nighttime. Cumulat ive labeling indexes were measured after 4 and 7 days in the terminal bronchioles, large intrapulmonary airways, trachea, and nasal epitheli a. The penetration of the lesions from the bronchiole-alveolar junctio n into the alveolar zone was measured with quantitative morphometry. A fter 4 days of exposure, the extent of injury was dose dependent. Labe ling indexes in the terminal bronchioles were 15-20% higher in animals exposed during nighttime compared with the animals exposed during day light hours. On the other hand, depth of penetration of ozone lesions into the centriacinar region was not significantly different in animal s exposed during the night compared with animals exposed during daytim e. Labeling indexes in the large airways, trachea, or nasal cavity wer e not influenced by time of exposure. Between days 4 and 7, the lesion s in the terminal bronchioles progressed only to a minimal degree (10% ). It was concluded that the pattern of centriacinar tissue remodeling 1) followed a gradient based on ozone concentration and 2) was essent ially complete after only 4 days of ozone exposure. Although a differe nce between daytime and nighttime exposure was observed, it was not co nsidered to be large enough to invalidate conclusions drawn from studi es in which animals are exposed to ozone during daylight hours.