Shame, recently so extensively investigated in the individual and family th
erapy literature, has remained curiously underexplored in the group literat
ure since Alonso and Rutan's noteworthy article on the subject in 1988. Sha
me is frequently bypassed because, as a result of its hidden nature, its pr
esence is often not detected. This article strives to insure that shame doe
s not go unaddressed. We catalogue and discuss six defenses that may sugges
t the subterranean workings of shame: (1) focusing on themes that stress si
milarities among members, (2) generating feelings of scorn and disdain, (3)
avoiding here-and-now material, (4) inducing guilt, (5) transference react
ions, and (6) preserving the illusion of the leader's infallibility. The be
st antidote for shame's neglect is a heightened readiness to detect it. Suc
h detection is important because shame plays some role in many of our patie
nts' complaints.