Jp. Slabbert et al., A comparison of the potential therapeutic gain of p(66)/Be neutrons and d(14)/Be neutrons, INT J RAD O, 47(4), 2000, pp. 1059-1065
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To determine the relationship between photon sensitivity and neutr
on sensitivity and between neutron RBE and photon resistance for two neutro
n modalities (with mean energies of 6 and 29 MeV) using human tumor cell li
nes spanning a wide range of radiosensitivities, the principal objective be
ing whether or not a neutron advantage can be demonstrated.
Methods and Materials: Eleven human tumor cell Lines with mean photon inact
ivation doses of 1.65-4.35 Gy were irradiated with 0-5.0 Gy of p(66)/Be neu
trons (mean energy of 29 MeV) at Faure, S.A. and the same plating was irrad
iated on the same day with 0-10.0 Gy of Cobalt-gamma-rays, Twelve human tum
or cell lines, many of which were identical with the above selection, and s
panning mean photon inactivation doses of 1.75-4.08 Gy, were irradiated wit
h 0-4 Gy of d(14)/Be neutrons (mean energy of 6 MeV) and with 0-10.0 Gy of
240 kVp X-rays at the Essen Klinikum, Cell survival was determined by the c
lonogenic assay, and data mere fitted to the Linear quadratic equation,
Results: 1, Using the mean inactivation dose, a significant correlation was
found to exist between neutron sensitivity and photon sensitivity. However
, this correlation was more pronounced in the Faure beam (r(2) = 0.89 p les
s than or equal to 0.0001) than in the Essen beam (r(2) = 0.65, p = 0.0027)
, 2, No significant relationship could be established between neutron RBE a
nd photon resistance for both modalities (p = 0.69 and p = 0.07, respective
ly), 3, Using alpha-coefficients as a criterion, the neutron sensitivity fo
r the Faure beam correlated with photon sensitivity (p 0.001), but this did
not apply to the Essen beam (p = 0.27). 4. The neutron RBE for the Essen b
eam derived from alpha-coefficients showed a steep increase with photon res
istance (p = 0.003). In the Faure beam there was no increase of RBE with ph
oton resistance (p = 0.494).
Conclusion: Radiobiological differences between high-energy and low-energy
neutrons are particularly apparent in the dependence of the neutron RBE on
photon sensitivity. The increase of RBE with photon resistance is more pron
ounced in the low-energy Essen neutrons than in the high-energy Faure neutr
ons. An RBE advantage is indicated for photon-resistant cell lines and this
is particularly apparent in the low-dose range using alpha-coefficients as
compared to the mean inactivation dose. The clinical application of low-en
ergy neutrons may be more restricted because of poor penetration and lack o
f skin sparing. However, these neutrons discriminate better between photon-
sensitive and photon-resistant cells giving an RBE range of 2-6 and a mean
RBE of 4,1, than high-energy neutrons where the RBE range is 1.6-3.5 and th
e mean RBE is 2,4, From the radiobiological point of view it, therefore, ap
pears that the clinical potential of low-energy neutrons is considerably un
derrated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.