Fam. Tuyttens et al., Comparative study on the consequences of culling badgers (Meles meles) on biometrics, population dynamics and movement, J ANIM ECOL, 69(4), 2000, pp. 567-580
1. Capture-mark-recapture data were used to describe the process of recover
y from a typical badger removal operation (BRO) at North Nibley, Gloucester
shire, UK, which was carried out as part of the government's strategy to co
ntrol bovine tuberculosis. Data on biometrics, demographics and movement fr
om this low-density disturbed population were compared with those of two ne
arby high-density undisturbed populations (Wytham Woods and Woodchester Par
k, UK) in order to study fundamental principles of population dynamics and
density-dependence.
2. Badgers moved more between social groups at North Nibley than in the oth
er study areas, particularly in the immediate aftermath of the removal oper
ation.
3. Recolonization of the vacated habitat occurred in the first instance by
young females.
4. Although in the first year after the BRO no cubs had been reared in any
of the culled groups, and although the shortage of sexually mature boars ma
y have limited the reproductive output of sows in the following year, the p
opulation took only 3 years to recover to its (already lowered) preremoval
density.
5. Losses from the adult (and cub) population due to mortality or emigratio
n were smaller at North Nibley than at the other sites.
6. There was much evidence that during 1995 and 1996 density-dependent effe
cts constrained the reproductive output of the high-density populations, an
d some support for the hypothesis that badgers exhibit the non-linear 'larg
e mammal' type of functional response to density.
7. Badgers at North Nibley were younger, heavier and in better condition th
an badgers at Wytham Woods and Woodchester Park.
8. We argue that the disease dynamics are likely to be different in disturb
ed compared with undisturbed badger populations, and that this could affect
the effectiveness of BROs.