Km. Keeney et al., The effects of response cost in the treatment of aberrant behavior maintained by negative reinforcement, J APPL BE A, 33(2), 2000, pp. 255-258
Positive reinforcement contingencies can sometimes be used to decrease prob
lem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement (e.g., escape). In the cu
rrent study we evaluated the extent to which response cost (i.e., contingen
t removal of a preferred stimulus) would compete with the negative reinforc
er maintaining destructive behavior. The response cost contingency reduced
destructive behavior by 87% from baseline levels even though the negative r
einforcement contingency (i.e., escape) remained in place.